About
If you've got a story, picture, or link that's beyond belief, send it to tipline@haveigotoneforyou.com with your name and where you heard about it and we'll add it!
Accounts
Click here to check if anything new just came in.
March 22 2012
NCBI ROFL: Scientific study exposes lying on online dating profiles.
Separating fact from fiction: an examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles.
“This study examines self-presentation in online dating profiles using a novel cross-validation technique for establishing accuracy. Eighty online daters rated the accuracy of their online self-presentation. Information about participants’ physical attributes was then collected (height, weight, and age) and compared with their online profile, revealing that deviations tended to be ubiquitous but small in magnitude. Men lied more about their height, and women lied more about their weight, with participants farther from the mean lying more. Participants’ self-ratings of accuracy were significantly correlated with observed accuracy, suggesting that inaccuracies were intentional rather than self-deceptive. Overall, participants reported being the least accurate about their photographs and the most accurate about their relationship information. Deception patterns suggest that participants strategically balanced the deceptive opportunities presented by online self-presentation (e.g., the editability of profiles) with the social constraints of establishing romantic relationships (e.g., the anticipation of future interaction).”
Photo: flickr/Cali4beach
Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: The science of Facebook relationship status: It’s complicated.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Mirror, mirror on my Facebook wall: effects of exposure ...
March 06 2012
NCBI ROFL: I wish I could add “artificial saliva” to this abstract.
Effects of adding fluids to solid foods on muscle activity and number of chewing cycles.
“The production of a sufficient amount of saliva is indispensable for good chewing. In the present study, we examined the hypothesis that adding fluid to a food will facilitate the chewing process, especially for dry foods. The effect might be larger for subjects with relatively low salivary flow rates. Furthermore, adding fluids that contain mucins or alpha-amylase may have a larger facilitating effect on mastication than the addition of water alone. Twenty subjects chewed on melba toast, breakfast cake, carrot, peanut, and Gouda cheese. In addition, they chewed on these foods after different volumes of water, artificial saliva containing mucins, or a solution of alpha-amylase had been added. Muscle activity and number of chewing strokes until swallowing were measured. The salivary flow rates of the subjects were also determined. Adding fluid to the food significantly reduced the number of chewing cycles and total muscular work (i.e. the integrated surface electromyograpy of masseter and temporalis muscles measured bilaterally, summed for all chewing cycles) until swallowing for all foods, except carrot. The largest effects were observed for melba and cake, which are ...
February 25 2012
NCBI ROFL: College hookup SMACKDOWN: Extroverts vs. Introverts!
Personality as a predictor of hooking up among college students.
“Hookups–casual sexual encounters that may or may not include intercourse – are common on college campuses. Previous research has suggested that these casual sexual encounters may have serious health-related consequences. Understanding the relationships among multiple predictors of hooking up is important if high-risk prevention programming among college students is to be effective. This study considers each of the Big Five personality traits as predictors of hooking-up behaviors in a sample of Midwestern undergraduates (N = 247). Fifty-six percent of women and 63% of men reported engaging in a hookup. In general, Extraversion was positively associated with hooking up behaviors; Conscientiousness was negatively associated with hooking up. Relationships between personality and hooking up were significant while controlling for alcohol use. Implications for prevention programming on college campuses are discussed.”
Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Women’s negotiation of cunnilingus in college hookups and relationships.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Probably the most horrifying scientific lecture ever.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: And the August “no sh*t, Sherlock” award goes to…
NCBI ROFL. Real articles. Funny subjects.
Read our
February 24 2012
NCBI ROFL: And the February “no sh*t, Sherlock” award goes to…
Gender portrayals in telephone books for gay community versus Pacific-Bell Yellow Pages.
“Photographic images (N = 2,700) from three 1997 Pacific-Bell Yellow Pages (n = 1,976) and from three 1996-97 gay, lesbian, and bisexual community telephone books (n = 724) were classified into three groups by visible features (definite male, definite female, and gender nonspecific). The latter were excluded. The proportion of male photographic images was larger in gay community books than in Pacific-Bell telephone books.”
|
|
|
Photo: flickr/NCinDC
Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: And the December “no sh*t, Sherlock” award goes to…
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: And the And the October “no sh*t, Sherlock” award goes to…
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: And the April “No sh*t, Sherlock” award goes to…
February 22 2012
NCBI ROFL: A field study of bar-sponsored drink specials and their associations with patron intoxication.
“OBJECTIVE:
The study examined associations between bar-sponsored drink specials and alcohol intoxication at the patron level.
METHOD:
Data were collected in a college bar district located in a large campus community in the southeastern United States. Random and self-selected samples of patrons were interviewed after exiting college bars at night on four different nights (N=383). Anonymous interview and questionnaire data were collected as well as breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) readings.
RESULTS:
Significant gender differences existed in patron drinking practices. Women were more likely to take advantage of drink specials, whereas men reported greater alcohol expenditures, consumed more drinks, and drank for longer periods of time. Gender differences in BrAC were very small and not meaningful. Patrons who did not take advantage of drink specials reported consuming more drinks before bar entry than patrons who did participate in these promotions. Participation in “all-you-can-drink” promotions was significantly associated with higher BrAC readings after adjusting for covariates and random effects attributable to drinking establishment. Other drink specials did not have significant associations with alcohol intoxication.
CONCLUSIONS:
The all-you-can-drink special may be the specific discounting practice ...
January 25 2012
NCBI ROFL: The effect of women’s suggestive clothing on men’s behavior and judgment: a field study.
“Numerous studies have shown that men overestimate the sexual intent of women based on their clothing style; however, this hypothesis has not been assessed empirically in a natural setting. This small field study measured the time it took for men to approach two female confederates sitting in a tavern, one wearing suggestive clothes and one wearing more conservative clothes. The behavior of 108 men was observed over 54 periods on 16 different nights in two different taverns. The time it took for the men to approach after initial eye contact was significantly shorter in the suggestive clothing condition. The men were also asked by male confederates to rate the likelihood of having a date with the women, and having sex on the first date. The men rated their chances to have a date and to have sex significantly higher in the suggestive clothing condition. Results are discussed with respect to men’s possible misinterpretation that women’s clothing indicates sexual interest, and the risks associated with the misinterpretation.”
Photo: Flickr/philosophygeek
Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Does this outfit make me look like I want to get laid?
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Women’s bust ...
January 20 2012
NCBI ROFL: Apparently, jumping with a weighted vest or springs attached to your shoes is hard.
Effects of loading on maximum vertical jumps: Selective effects of weight and inertia.
“A novel loading method was applied to explore selective effects of externally added weight (W), weight and inertia (W+I), and inertia (I) on maximum counter-movement jumps (CMJ) performed with arm swing. Externally applied extended rubber bands and/or loaded vest added W, W+I, and I corresponding to 10-40% of subjects’ body mass. As expected, an increase in magnitude of all types of load was associated with an increase in ground reaction forces (GRF), as well as with a decrease in both the jumping performance and power output. However, of more importance could be that discernible differences among the effects of W, W+I, and I were recorded despite a relatively narrow loading range. In particular, an increase in W was associated with the minimal changes in movement kinematic pattern and smallest reduction of jumping performance, while also allowing for the highest power output. Conversely, W+I was associated with the highest ground reaction forces. Finally, the lowest maxima of GRF and power were associated with I. Although further research is apparently needed, the obtained finding could be of potential importance not only for understanding ...
January 18 2012
NCBI ROFL: And the And the January “no sh*t, Sherlock” award goes to…
Effects of heated seats in vehicles on thermal comfort during the initial warm-up period.
“Eight subjects participated in a subjective experiment of eight conditions to investigate the effects of heated seats in vehicles on skin temperature, thermal sensation and thermal comfort during the initial warm-up period. The experimental conditions were designed as a combination of air temperature in the test room (5, 10, 15, or 20 °C) and heated seat (on/off). The heated seat was effective for improving thermal comfort during the initial warm-up period when air temperature was lower than 15 °C. Use of heated seats prevented decreases in or increased toe skin temperature. Heated seats also increased foot thermal sensation at 15 and 20 °C. Optimal thermal sensation in contact with the seat was higher when air temperature was lower. Optimal skin temperature in contact with the seat back was higher than that with the seat cushion. Moreover, these optimal skin temperatures were higher when air temperature was lower.”
Photo: flickr/kjarrett
Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: The windshield splatter metagenome.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: An unusual perversion: the desire to be injured by an ...
January 05 2012
NCBI ROFL: Naturalistic observations of beer drinking among college students.
“We observed the beer drinking behavior of 308 university students in several bar and party settings. The following relationships were found: males drinking beer in bars consumed 0.92 oz per min; females drank less beer than males, and stayed in a bar for a longer time period; patrons drank significantly more beer when drinking in groups and when purchasing beer in pitchers versus cups or bottles; and intervals between party arrival and first drink and between party departure and last drink varied inversely with blood alcohol concentration. We discuss these findings with regard to developing interventions to prevent alcohol-impaired driving.”
Photo: Flickr/.A.A.
Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Superbowl Special: Sports fans who tailgate are more likely to get drunk.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Surprising study finds humongous drinks have more alcohol!
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Anticipated versus actual alcohol consumption during 21st birthday celebrations.
WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ!
December 21 2011
NCBI ROFL: And the December “no sh*t, Sherlock” award goes to…
Possibilities to improve the aircraft interior comfort experience.
“Comfort plays an increasingly important role in the interior design of airplanes. Although ample research has been conducted on airplane design technology, only a small amount of public scientific information is available addressing the passenger’s opinion. In this study, more than 10,000 internet trip reports and 153 passenger interviews were used to gather opinions about aspects which need to be improved in order to design a more comfortable aircraft interior. The results show clear relationships between comfort and legroom, hygiene, crew attention and seat/personal space. Passengers rate the newer planes significantly better than older ones, indicating that attention to design for comfort has proven effective. The study also shows that rude flight attendants and bad hygiene reduce the comfort experience drastically and that a high comfort rating is related to higher “fly again” values.”
Photo: Flickr/SpecialKRB
Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Hijacking a plane flown by euthanized pigs: a beginner’s manual.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Airplane vacuum toilets: an uncommon travel hazard.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: College students’ perceived risk and anxiety after reading airplane crash news.
WTF is NCBI ROFL? ...
November 22 2011
NCBI ROFL: The Mere Anticipation of an Interaction with a Woman Can Impair Men’s Cognitive Performance.
“Recent research suggests that heterosexual men’s (but not heterosexual women’s) cognitive performance is impaired after an interaction with someone of the opposite sex (Karremans et al., 2009). These findings have been interpreted in terms of the cognitive costs of trying to make a good impression during the interaction. In everyday life, people frequently engage in pseudo-interactions with women (e.g., through the phone or the internet) or anticipate interacting with a woman later on. The goal of the present research was to investigate if men’s cognitive performance decreased in these types of situations, in which men have little to no opportunity to impress her and, moreover, have little to no information about the mate value of their interaction partner. Two studies demonstrated that men’s (but not women’s) cognitive performance declined if they were led to believe that they interacted with a woman via a computer (Study 1) or even if they merely anticipated an interaction with a woman (Study 2). Together, these results suggest that an actual interaction is not a necessary prerequisite for the cognitive impairment effect to occur. Moreover, these effects occur even if men do not get information about the woman’s attractiveness. ...
November 05 2011
NCBI ROFL: Salivary testosterone levels in men at a U.S. sex club.
“Vertebrate males commonly experience elevations in testosterone levels in response to sexual stimuli, such as presentation of a novel mating partner. Some previous human studies have shown that watching erotic movies increases testosterone levels in males although studies measuring testosterone changes during actual sexual intercourse or masturbation have yielded mixed results. Small sample sizes, “unnatural” lab-based settings, and invasive techniques may help account for mixed human findings. Here, we investigated salivary testosterone levels in men watching (n = 26) versus participating (n = 18) in sexual activity at a large U.S. sex club. The present study entailed minimally invasive sample collection (measuring testosterone in saliva), a naturalistic setting, and a larger number of subjects than previous work to test three hypotheses related to men’s testosterone responses to sexual stimuli. Subjects averaged 40 years of age and participated between 11:00 pm and 2:10 am. Consistent with expectations, results revealed that testosterone levels increased 36% among men during a visit to the sex club, with the magnitude of testosterone change significantly greater among participants (72%) compared with observers (11%). Contrary to expectation, men’s testosterone changes were unrelated to their age. These findings were generally consistent with vertebrate studies indicating elevated male testosterone in response to sexual stimuli, but also point out the importance of study context since participation in sexual behavior had a stronger effect on testosterone increases in this study but unlike some previous human lab-based studies.”
Photo: Flickr/ F3LONY
Thanks to @cqchoi for today’s ROFL!
Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: The effects of acute ethanol consumption on sexual response and sexual risk-taking intent.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Women’s bust size and men’s courtship solicitation.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Beauty week: Blond, busty, skinny waitresses get bigger tips.
WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ!
October 13 2011
NCBI ROFL: Why overheard cell phone conversations are extra annoying.
Overheard cell-phone conversations: when less speech is more distracting.
“Why are people more irritated by nearby cell-phone conversations than by conversations between two people who are physically present? Overhearing someone on a cell phone means hearing only half of a conversation–a “halfalogue.” We show that merely overhearing a halfalogue results in decreased performance on cognitive tasks designed to reflect the attentional demands of daily activities. By contrast, overhearing both sides of a cell-phone conversation or a monologue does not result in decreased performance. This may be because the content of a halfalogue is less predictable than both sides of a conversation. In a second experiment, we controlled for differences in acoustic factors between these types of overheard speech, establishing that it is the unpredictable informational content of halfalogues that results in distraction. Thus, we provide a cognitive explanation for why overheard cell-phone conversations are especially irritating: Less-predictable speech results in more distraction for a listener engaged in other tasks.”
Photo: icanhascheezburger
Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: f u cn read dis it means ur gud @ sp.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: OMG! ur cell phone is mkng u impotent.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Garlic: a sensory pleasure or a social nuisance?
WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ!
October 12 2011
NCBI ROFL: And the And the October “no sh*t, Sherlock” award goes to…
Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence.
“The brain circuitry processing rewarding and aversive stimuli is hypothesized to be at the core of motivated behavior. In this study, discrete categories of beautiful faces are shown to have differing reward values and to differentially activate reward circuitry in human subjects. In particular, young heterosexual males rate pictures of beautiful males and females as attractive, but exert effort via a keypress procedure only to view pictures of attractive females. Functional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T shows that passive viewing of beautiful female faces activates reward circuitry, in particular the nucleus accumbens. An extended set of subcortical and paralimbic reward regions also appear to follow aspects of the keypress rather than the rating procedures, suggesting that reward circuitry function does not include aesthetic assessment.”
Photo: flickr/indi.ca
Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: I don’t think this explains why my passport picture sucks.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Beauty week: Do hotter men have better semen?
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Beauty week: Beauty and the teeth.
WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ!
September 29 2011
NCBI ROFL: Scientists say sloppy supper servings seem seriously substandard.
Neatness counts. How plating affects liking for the taste of food.
“Two studies investigated the effect that the arrangement of food on a plate has on liking for the flavor of the food. Food presented in a neatly arranged presentation is liked more than the same food presented in a messy manner. A third study found that subjects expected to like the food in the neat presentations more than in the messy ones and would be willing to pay more for them. They also indicated that the food in the neat presentations came from a higher quality restaurant and that more care was taken with its preparation than the food in the messy presentations. Only the animal-based food was judged as being more contaminated when presented in a messy rather than a neat way. Neatness of the food presentation increases liking for the taste of the food by suggesting greater care on the part of the preparer. Two mechanisms by which greater care might increase liking are discussed.”
Photo: flickr/C Jill Reed
Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: New weight loss plan: drink crappy wine.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Eating behavior and obesity at Chinese buffets.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: I’d like a number 2 value meal, a frosty, and a peer-reviewed publication, please.
WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ!
September 15 2011
NCBI ROFL: Social perceptions of individuals missing upper front teeth.
“Although it is assumed that there are negative social consequences for individuals missing visible front teeth, no study of the way in which edentulous individuals were perceived in a social context and the potential social repercussions could be located. This initial study concerned college students’ perceptions of individuals missing visible upper front teeth. 200 volunteers, 19 to 50 years of age (M = 20.6, SD = 4.4), rated five photographs depicting tooth presence or absence, from a full dentition to missing as many as four upper front teeth, on social traits including attractiveness, health status, educational attainment, satisfaction with life, active social life, aggressiveness, intelligence, trustworthiness, amount of caring, friendship, dating, and likelihood to live as a neighbor. Analysis suggested a person missing visible teeth was more negatively perceived on all social traits than a person with full dentition. Results were strongest when students were proposed to be linked to the edentulous individual in a personal way, i.e., dating or living as neighbor. Men and women agreed on perceptions of social traits and dentition condition. These results suggest the presence of strong Western cultural values, whereby those who are missing teeth may experience significant barriers to personal and social success.”
Photo: flickr/gareth1953
Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Beauty week: Beauty and the teeth.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Smelly Week: Smelling like rubber makes your face look uglier.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Morning breath odor: influence of treatments on sulfur gases.
WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ!
September 07 2011
NCBI ROFL: This just in: women like to be flattered!
Self-perceived technical orientation and attitudes toward being flattered.
“An investigation was done of the relationship between scores on the Technical Orientation Scale and self-ratings of liking to be flattered among 103 working adults. As hypothesized, scores for technical orientation were negatively correlated with two self-report measures of liking to be flattered. Women had a significantly stronger rating for liking to be flattered. We conclude that a technical orientation may be a moderator variable for the potential of liking to be flattered.”
Photo: flickr/inkjetprinter
Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Okay, so when are men *not* thinking about food, sex, and sleep?
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Why women like men in red cars.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Apparently women (but not men) like monkey sex… literally.
WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ!
September 05 2011
NCBI ROFL: If you want to get hired, better shave that beard.
Perception of men’s personal qualities and prospect of employment as a function of facial hair.
“The present study investigated the contribution of men’s facial hair to impression formation. Participants evaluated photographs of one of four versions of a man–clean shaven, mustached, goateed, or bearded–on a 7-point scale. In Study 1, participants were 106 Brazilian undergraduates (68 men and 38 women). Beardedness was associated with older age, greater responsibility, and leftist political ideas. In Study 2, respondents were 50 Brazilian personnel managers (28 men and 22 women) who made hiring decisions at different companies in the city of Saõ Paulo. Personnel managers clearly preferred clean shaven over bearded, mustached, or goateed men as prospective employees. In a hiring situation for a conservative occupation, a man who signals disposition to conform to rules may be preferred by personnel managers over another who signals nonconformity.”
Photo: flickr/zieak
Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Innocent until proven bearded.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Why Santa Claus shouldn’t work in a lab.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Are male interior designers perceived as homosexual?
WTF is ...
August 04 2011
NCBI ROFL: College students’ perceived risk and anxiety after reading airplane crash news.
“328 college students in midwest and west coast regions read one of five news stories (four airplane crash and one irrelevant) or none. They estimated the likelihood of their victimization in an airplane crash and indicated the maximum amount of time that they would be willing to spend driving in lieu of flying. Analysis showed those who read one of the airplane crash stories reported higher perceived risk of victimization than did those who read the irrelevant story or none. Reading airplane crash news was not related to the number of hours reported for driving instead of flying.”
Photo: flickr/J.C.Photos
Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Groundbreaking study proves it’s hard to see in the dark.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Clueless doctor sleeps through math class, reinvents calculus… and names it after herself.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Shocking study finds New Year’s resolutions work better than procrastination!
WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ!
August 02 2011
NCBI ROFL: And the August “no sh*t, Sherlock” award goes to…
Fish-hook injuries: a risk for fishermen.
“Fishing is one of the best known and practiced human activities. However, you should remember that, when casting the hook from the riverbank or grasping it to add bait, fishermen run a real risk of injury if the hook punctures the skin. Briefly we describe a case where a young, 32-year-old fisherman who was reeling the hook back to shore when it hit him in the face and embedded itself in his upper eyelid. Upon examination, the eye was found to be unharmed and the hook was removed through a small incision and the aid of a local anesthetic.In the light of this case report, we think it a good idea to advise our friends and patients who we know to be fishermen to wear some form of eye protection as a precaution.”
Photo: flickr/Lazurite
Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: And the April “No sh*t, Sherlock” award goes to…
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: And the March “No s**t, Sherlock” award goes to…
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: And September’s “No shit, Sherlock” award goes ...
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
